Other Legislation & Issues

• H

  Article: Security is a business requirement 2114
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  105
  Views

  No one has replied

• D

  SEM Group Files chapter 11 with USD3.2 bn oil trading loss 2502
  • Denis  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  129
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  CIO Magazine Article - Is Sarbanes-Oxley Working? 1622
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  84
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  Article: S.E.C. Eases Regulations on Business 1890
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  88
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  HIPAA audit: The 42 questions HHS might ask 2082
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  124
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  Network World Article: SOX - Five years of headaches 2129
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  87
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  CIO Magazine Article - Is Sarbanes-Oxley Working? 1622
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  65
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  Article: Expect SOX 2007 reforms to help Audit and not IT 1869
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  90
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  Article: S.E.C. Eases Regulations on Business 1890
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  83
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  SEC approves Sarbanes-Oxley changes for section 404 2058
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  95
  Views

  No one has replied

• D

  SAS Type 2 Audit 2808
  • datcolin  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  90
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  Ethics - Foundation for an individual, company, _and_amp; nation 2812
  • harrywaldron  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  89
  Views

  No one has replied

• S

  Inventory for forest industry 2912
  • SOXCarol  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  83
  Views

  No one has replied

• S

  reasons deserve exemption 2941
  • selena151  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  83
  Views

  No one has replied

• D

  SOX Questions- BRP project 2013 3262
  • dannyA  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  100
  Views

  No one has replied

• J

  Advice please. 161
  • jma  

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  102
  Views

  K

  Your company doesn’t owe you anything from a legal perspective. It would be nice if they would acknowledge what you did and hold it up to others as the right thing to do. There is whistleblower protection in the SOX legislation. This should protect you from any retaliation due to your reporting the fraud. You are probably responsible for proving any actions that may have harmed you. There is no requirement to report the fraud to the government (unless you are a government contractor, then you may have certain contractual obligations). I assume that you work for a public company. As to whether or not there is any obligation to report this in your external financial statements is based on whether or not the misstatement was material. This is a judgement call by management and agreed to by your external auditor. Companies are free to set their own severance policies. It is not setting a good example to give the employee a large package when he leaves, but is not illegal, either.
• K

  SOX Progress 195
  • kevinc  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  117
  Views

  S

  I assume these percentages are of those who have actually started with the compliance process. We know from surveys, like the one on this site, that a frightening percentage haven’t.
• S

  Current Issues... 201
  • SOX-Migration  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  139
  Views

  S

  For me the hot topic is compliance itself… with deadlines approaching. I’m new to this, but am grateful for all the expertise on this board.
• S

  EU Turnbull Legistlation, Basel Accord 153
  • SOX-Migration  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  158
  Views

  H

  Hi, I am working for a insurance company. When we started our SOX work we adopted a integrated approach, meaning adressing SOX and operational Risk within one go. We had to learn the hard way that in our case it wouldn’t work having to meet the SOX deadline. Most of the involved Poeple were mixing up SOX and ORM risks and got very soon very confused. On Top of that SOX is consuming so many resources… So we ended up postponing the operational Risk Part until we reached the SOX deadline.
• S

  Please Help...HELP 215
  • SOX-Migration  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  124
  Views

  H

  As long as you show that money is leaving the company and what it is spent for (in this case employee costs) and showing that in your bookings/paperwork, you’re fine. No SOX rules violated. The rest is totally operational risk.