Local controls vrs regional controls 2758
moyasv last edited by
A few months ago we finish the 2009 Sarbox review for local changes control (local changes managed locally) and we found no deficiencies.
Two weeks ago, I was instructed to review the regional changes controls (changes in others countries managed locally) and found several deficiencies. There are no differences between both process but the regional responsibility has just been turned to us due to a consolidation strategy; before that, was managed locally in every country. I want to issue a recommendation to merge local changes and regional changes under the same sarbox process (and assessment) to avoid duplicate reporting and issues consolidating. This means that some local changes controls will appear deficient and I’m sure it’ll become a mayor issue.
Is there any documentation that I can use to support my recommendation?